From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,f392356eeb44466d X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII Received: by 10.68.190.99 with SMTP id gp3mr206966pbc.1.1326410748569; Thu, 12 Jan 2012 15:25:48 -0800 (PST) Path: lh20ni175390pbb.0!nntp.google.com!news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!r16g2000yqi.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: KK6GM Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: SofCheck merged with AdaCore Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 15:24:29 -0800 (PST) Organization: http://groups.google.com Message-ID: <88947f8c-8fd3-4e70-a7c1-cd4ccb3543ad@r16g2000yqi.googlegroups.com> References: <4bc21527-2cc3-476d-ad76-db75ba94e024@i26g2000vbt.googlegroups.com> <21952370.1541.1326314596784.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@vbyc22> <1824361522348046178.308018martin-re.mo.ve.thedowies.com@news.btinternet.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 12.35.64.226 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Trace: posting.google.com 1326410748 7702 127.0.0.1 (12 Jan 2012 23:25:48 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 23:25:48 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: r16g2000yqi.googlegroups.com; posting-host=12.35.64.226; posting-account=qZVz2QoAAAAN9WxYp-9jYb7jORc4Zqwt User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-Via: 1.1 barracudaweb.tritool.rancho:8080 (http_scan/4.0.2.6.19) X-Google-Web-Client: true X-Google-Header-Order: ARLUEHCVNK X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; Trident/4.0; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.04506.30; .NET CLR 3.0.4506.2152; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; MDDR; .NET4.0C; .NET4.0E; InfoPath.1; BRI/2),gzip(gfe) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: 2012-01-12T15:24:29-08:00 List-Id: On Jan 11, 11:31=A0pm, Martin Dowie wrote: > Tucker Taft wrote: > > No need for any FUD. =A0We will continue to support the AdaMagic front = end > > in much the same way we have for the past 15 years. > > > -Tucker Taft > > That's good to know! Is it possible that the merger could actually improv= e > the situation with AdaMagic becoming more Ada2012 featured?... That would be a fabulous outcome. And then if an unsupported GPL version could be made available, Ada exposure in the embedded community might really blossom. I know I'd use it in a heartbeat wherever I could (even the current Ada95 product).