From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID, MSGID_RANDY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,fa2cc518ef3b992c X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: blaak@infomatch.com Subject: Re: scripting/extension language for Ada (was : Re: tagged types extensions) Date: 2000/02/12 Message-ID: <883evq$spp$1@nnrp1.deja.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 584906614 References: <389207CC.C16D80E8@averstar.com> <38971028.BB16D8A2@earthlink.net> <3899F757.FAE131B3@free.fr> <389D43A6.786C7B79@free.fr> <881hft$9ac1@news.cis.okstate.edu> X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x33.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 207.34.170.121 Organization: Deja.com - Before you buy. X-Article-Creation-Date: Sat Feb 12 11:08:43 2000 GMT X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDblaak Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.61 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.0.18 i486) Date: 2000-02-12T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article <881hft$9ac1@news.cis.okstate.edu>, dstarner98@aasaa.ofe.org wrote: > Given SML-NJ, what would it take for a ML shell besides some shell > functions that could be written in ML? I.e. would just a ML library > turn SML-NJ into what you're looking for? I don't know. I suppose I would have to learn ML properly. Most lisps have decent macro systems with which one can write embedded languages fairly easily, allowing one to use, for example, a nice process invocation syntax. Can ML do this sort of thing? Ray Blaak blaak@infomatch.com Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ Before you buy.