From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,fa2cc518ef3b992c X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: dvdeug@x8b4e53cd.dhcp.okstate.edu (David Starner) Subject: Re: scripting/extension language for Ada (was : Re: tagged types extensions) Date: 2000/02/11 Message-ID: <881hft$9ac1@news.cis.okstate.edu>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 584639194 References: <389207CC.C16D80E8@averstar.com> <38971028.BB16D8A2@earthlink.net> <3899F757.FAE131B3@free.fr> <389D43A6.786C7B79@free.fr> Organization: Oklahoma State University User-Agent: slrn/0.9.6.2 (Linux) Reply-To: dstarner98@aasaa.ofe.org Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 2000-02-11T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: On 10 Feb 2000 13:35:57 -0800, Ray Blaak wrote: >Do ML or Haskell shells exist? It would be interesting to see how implicit >static strong typing makes things more correct while style allowing for easy >writing of command scripts. Given SML-NJ, what would it take for a ML shell besides some shell functions that could be written in ML? I.e. would just a ML library turn SML-NJ into what you're looking for? -- David Starner - dstarner98@aasaa.ofe.org Only a nerd would worry about wrong parentheses with square brackets. But that's what mathematicians are. -- Dr. Burchard, math professor at OSU