From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_DATE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!lll-lcc!ames!pasteur!ucbvax!grebyn.COM!karl From: karl@grebyn.COM (Karl Nyberg) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Address clauses for packages, subprograms and tasks Message-ID: <8809142106.AA23771@grebyn.com> Date: 14 Sep 88 21:06:23 GMT Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU Organization: Grebyn Corporation List-Id: [Ed. - forwarded.] -- Karl -- Date: Wed, 14 Sep 88 16:19:44 edt From: haven!nswc-g.ARPA!jrovert To: info-ada@ajpo.sei.cmu.edu We are in the process of purchasing an Ada system. It has come to our attention that the address clauses for packages, subprograms and tasks are not implemented in the systems we are reviewing. Our question is : Is there a conceptual problem implementing these Chapter 13 features. Any information about a) The address clause b) Other Ada systems running on a VAX host running VMS 4.7 and higher with a MC68020/68881 cross compiler. c) Tools used with the above system e.i cross reference, module dependency etc. d) Availability of a tool to extract inforamtion from a DIANA or similar file(s) for use in inhouse tools. will be greatly appreciated. John F. Rovert