From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_05,INVALID_DATE,
	UNRESOLVED_TEMPLATE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ucbvax!eg.ti.COM!PETCHER%SVDSD
From: PETCHER%SVDSD@eg.ti.COM
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: RE: INFO-ADA Digest V88 #15
Message-ID: <8801160013.AA20881@ajpo.sei.cmu.edu>
Date: 15 Jan 88 18:53:00 GMT
Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Distribution: world
Organization: The ARPA Internet
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

I honestly don't think the inception of the "Info-Ada Digest" has reduced 
traffic one iota.  It has consistently come out with one or two messages per 
issue, while adding overhead to produce it as a digest in the first place.  If 
any reduction of traffic has occurred, it is only because the actual number of 
messages appearing on the mailing list has reduced to about half its previous 
level.  Is everybody so excited about the Digest they've stopped posting on 
the list, or are the mechanics of producing the Digest somehow snarfing half 
the messages?

Malcolm Petcher