From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,3e2839f528cc1c40 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Florian Weimer Subject: Re: Project: FreeOS Date: 2000/01/15 Message-ID: <87zou7hehz.fsf@deneb.cygnus.argh.org>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 572915962 References: <387C8CB3.1276637F@icn.siemens.de> <85j75o$ofk$1@news08.btx.dtag.de> <85jd6g$9qe2@news.cis.okstate.edu> <2000Jan13.081844.1@eisner> <85krc6$2mj$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <87vh4xwy8d.fsf@deneb.cygnus.argh.org> <85ll8e$nm9$1@nnrp1.deja.com> Mail-Copies-To: never Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Complaints-To: abuse@cygnus.argh.org X-Trace: deneb.cygnus.argh.org 947928408 4951 192.168.1.2 (15 Jan 2000 09:26:48 GMT) Organization: Penguin on board User-Agent: Gnus/5.0804 (Gnus v5.8.4) Emacs/20.4 Mime-Version: 1.0 Reply-To: Florian Weimer NNTP-Posting-Date: 15 Jan 2000 09:26:48 GMT Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 2000-01-15T09:26:48+00:00 List-Id: Ted Dennison writes: > > On the other hand, NT includes quite a few backwards-compatibility > > features (DOS, WoW, OS/2, POSIX). > > NT's "DOS" window never struck me as anything more than a command shell > that uses MS-DOS syntax for commands. Come on, it's a bit more than that. > And POSIX and OS/2 just seemed to be tack-ons, not something that > inflitrated the OS's design in any way. Well, NT was designed to run on a number of RISC platforms, and the members of the ACE consortium certainly wanted compatibility with their current systems. In the beginning, I think, it was important that the system could run, say, an Ultrix subsystem, although there was never developed one. In the end, hardly anyone cared about non-IA32 platforms, and support was discontinued for one after the other. The only remaining one, the Alpha platform, is probably kept only to have a 64 bit system to experiment with today, given the fact that Microsoft will have to port NT to a 64 bit RISC platform very soon. ;) > I believe support for both has already been "phased out". Yes, of course. The POSIX subsystem is nothing more than a bad joke, and the OS/2 subsystem is 1.x only, an the PM add-on was never widely used. On the other hand, the OS/2 subsystem runs Microsoft Multiplan very well (no more struggle with EMS ;).