From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,2d7ec12dd7db366 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-09-30 03:00:12 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!supernews.com!newsfeed.direct.ca!look.ca!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!193.174.75.178!news-fra1.dfn.de!news0.de.colt.net!newsfeed.r-kom.de!newsfeed.stueberl.de!newsfeed.vmunix.org!newsfeed2.easynews.net!easynews.net!news.cid.net!news.enyo.de!news1.enyo.de!not-for-mail From: Florian Weimer Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: How to rename a file? Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2001 12:21:09 +0200 Organization: Enyo's not your organization Message-ID: <87zo7dasiy.fsf@deneb.enyo.de> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:13542 Date: 2001-09-30T12:21:09+02:00 List-Id: Pascal Obry writes: >> made on "frameworks" (which POSIX bindings may perhaps also be included, as >> cross platform was in mind) and tools that abstract the C interfaces and >> work in a more Ada like nature. > > I won't call POSIX a framework since it is a _binding_ but yet not a > thin one. Most POSIX.5 implementations aren't bindings. > And yes in cross-platform environemnt it is definitly the choice, > this is why I do use it! IMHO, the POSIX.5 interface is a horrible mess, combining the uselessness of POSIX.1 with some additional unfortunate design decisions.