From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,ac39a12d5faf5b14
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-04-23 13:37:57 PST
From: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Outside view (still): Development process in the Ada community
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2002 22:37:53 +0200
Organization: Enyo -- not your organization
Message-ID: <87znzunobi.fsf@deneb.enyo.de>
References: <3CB46975.90408@snafu.de>
 <cc3099f93a91d1e9c18e88d1a6381f6f.48257@mygate.mailgate.org>
 <5ee5b646.0204171415.18ac5e85@posting.google.com>
 <99c4aee4a9ea33ca8fbe1e634b3b4f14.48257@mygate.mailgate.org>
 <3CBE49C4.99CFA22D@adaworks.com> <a9mjv9$t9b$1@nh.pace.co.uk>
 <3CC05650.5060908@snafu.de> <a9ppc5$fve$1@nh.pace.co.uk>
 <5ee5b646.0204220957.242468c6@posting.google.com>
 <3CC468AA.7070306@snafu.de> <87znzv1ny5.fsf@deneb.enyo.de>
 <3CC4E8E8.1090308@snafu.de>
NNTP-Posting-Host: deneb.enyo.de
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: cygnus.enyo.de 1019594278 28122 212.9.189.171 (23 Apr 2002 20:37:58
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@enyo.de
NNTP-Posting-Date: 23 Apr 2002 20:37:58 GMT
Cancel-Lock: sha1:i9Yxtez+WAc5t2fD7pH1jr7Gz/8=
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!sn-xit-01!supernews.com!195.40.4.120.MISMATCH!easynet-quince!easynet.net!proxad.net!feed.ac-versailles.fr!fu-berlin.de!news.uni-stuttgart.de!cert.uni-stuttgart.de!news.enyo.de!not-for-mail
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:23014
Date: 2002-04-23T20:37:58+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Michael Erdmann <Michael.Erdmann@snafu.de> writes:

>> There is already a contribution process: submit a patch to
>> gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org. ;-)

> But this has more the falvour of beeing an error correction
> process!?

Yes, your patch is subjected to review, of course.

Or do you think that the list is for GCC bug fixes only?  This is
wrong, all patches (even patches adding new features) should be sent
to this list for consideration.