From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DATE_IN_PAST_24_48 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,9983e856ed268154 X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Received: by 10.101.7.16 with SMTP id k16mr2725097ani.4.1344998913137; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 19:48:33 -0700 (PDT) Path: c6ni115589900qas.0!nntp.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!nrc-news.nrc.ca!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!newsfeed.x-privat.org!news.jacob-sparre.dk!munin.jacob-sparre.dk!pnx.dk!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Jacob Sparre Andersen Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Project files (Was: Should Inline be private in the private part of a package spec?) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2012 14:03:03 +0200 Organization: Jacob Sparre Andersen Research & Innovation Message-ID: <87zk5zngnc.fsf_-_@adaheads.sparre-andersen.dk> References: <501bd285$0$6564$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net> <502005b6$0$9510$9b4e6d93@newsspool1.arcor-online.net> <50203ca2$0$9512$9b4e6d93@newsspool1.arcor-online.net> <502040c0$0$9510$9b4e6d93@newsspool1.arcor-online.net> <50677fa2-7f82-4ccc-8c56-161bf67fefe1@googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 95.209.225.163.bredband.3.dk Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Trace: munin.nbi.dk 1344859385 14474 95.209.225.163 (13 Aug 2012 12:03:05 GMT) X-Complaints-To: news@jacob-sparre.dk NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2012 12:03:05 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:WoHvO30Lrn0itTvSUUBpApsjAmw= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: 2012-08-13T14:03:03+02:00 List-Id: Randy Brukardt wrote: > (The recompilation time they would save with shared files is probably > less than the time that they would spend on managing the projects.) We don't use project files to save compilation time. We do it to: a) reuse shared libraries b) direct the compiler at the proper target-specific package bodies > YMMV, of course, but I think "one-button builds" from raw (and > portable) source code is the ideal way to go. Agreed. > I'm now looking at ways to make that easier with Janus/Ada (one > obvious way is to eliminate the need for any special naming > conventions for Ada source code). How would you handle multiple available bodies for the same package? (I imagine it would turn it into at least a "two-button build".) Greetings, Jacob -- "Don't get me wrong, perl is an OK operating system, but it lacks a lightweight scripting language."