From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,26a21b9e317dc639
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Received: by 10.224.181.140 with SMTP id by12mr17887072qab.0.1356718670008;
        Fri, 28 Dec 2012 10:17:50 -0800 (PST)
Path: 
 k2ni3745qap.0!nntp.google.com!npeer01.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!border3.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border4.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newspeer1.nac.net!news.mi.ras.ru!goblin1!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.straub-nv.de!nuzba.szn.dk!news.jacob-sparre.dk!hugin.jacob-sparre.dk!news.thorslund.org!pnx.dk!not-for-mail
From: Gustaf Thorslund <gustaf@thorslund.org>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Access type to member procedure of instance (Object Oriented
 programming in Ada)
Date: Tue, 25 Dec 2012 22:51:39 +0100
Organization: gustaf.thorslund.org
Message-ID: <87zk114x78.fsf@katthult.thorslund.org>
References: <9b0bcb37-8ae3-440f-af4f-a796702e4250@googlegroups.com>
	<f197c0e9-f5aa-49a6-a5b6-962b2a41fc71@googlegroups.com>
	<dhv96vr07f0c.1fbtew9x164wm$.dlg@40tude.net>
	<6344b2a2-6ce5-4381-ad41-8dc4bf47902f@googlegroups.com>
	<agc909hka7hk$.offs8wrgrm0x$.dlg@40tude.net>
	<ea14b7bd-8ff9-4334-bd57-b2c94cc9ce3d@googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Trace: katthult.thorslund.org 1356472299 20944 ::1 (25 Dec 2012 21:51:39
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@thorslund.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 25 Dec 2012 21:51:39 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:goXdB1p60BDkmijHKQ9CU+BElZs=
X-Received-Bytes: 2028
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: 2012-12-25T22:51:39+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

ake.ragnar.dahlgren@gmail.com writes:

> Not that I have in mind an actual real world application that would
> require two identical windows, but of theoretical interest. 

I often find myself looking at same file in two buffers/windows in
emacs. Useful if you want to look at different parts of a file at the
same time. I suppose if you would have some 3D drawing application it
could be useful to look at different views at the same time too.

Hope I've not destroyed the fun of solving a theoretical problem by
bringing up two practical applications ;-)

/Gustaf