From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,d139a44b4dd6bc63
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!news3.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local01.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.scarlet.biz!news.scarlet.biz.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2006 12:00:16 -0600
From: Ludovic Brenta <ludovic@ludovic-brenta.org>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Possible heap problem on Windows, help sought
References: <456d72b1$0$31519$39db0f71@news.song.fi>
	<456d9441$0$24608$39db0f71@news.song.fi>
	<mailman.30.1164810040.4389.comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org>
	<4t5lq7F12jm1nU1@mid.individual.net>
	<456db855$0$24618$39db0f71@news.song.fi>
	<873b82qi90.fsf@ludovic-brenta.org>
	<456dc966$0$31542$39db0f71@news.song.fi>
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2006 19:00:55 +0100
Message-ID: <87y7pup1yg.fsf@ludovic-brenta.org>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:hZVk/dNtSt8AgzIq76lo7S2VBV4=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
NNTP-Posting-Host: 62.235.243.191
X-Trace: 
 sv3-iWIXhEsj1m49rQ0WVa+k73L2ENKJBJaa/feVxeIxt40LmRfZEqBB0EIMB+pzGnXF7BIzo9bdQ4SZaV5!ujztMhiSG8CsKS4/ZXkMtgIR1ZdDFgrd3Ak8VH3Hs+U80U2OL8cwAozkf688URv5PiwwyrHoLtM=
X-Complaints-To: abuse@scarlet.be
X-DMCA-Complaints-To: abuse@scarlet.biz
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint
 properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.32
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:7749
Date: 2006-11-29T19:00:55+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Niklas Holsti <niklas.holsti@nospam.please> writes:
> What do you think of a GNAT option to make debug-pools the default?
> Would it make sense?

Yes, definitely, and especially if it would synthesise a different
pool for each access type.  But I'm not aware of such an option.

>> That's obviously not on Windows; sorry for hijacking your thread,
>> Niklas :)
>
> Feel free, it seems my problem is not Windows-specific, either.

Thanks :)

-- 
Ludovic Brenta.