From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,f03ffdf470e3c559
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!194.25.134.126.MISMATCH!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!news.belwue.de!LF.net!news.enyo.de!not-for-mail
From: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Interesting performance quirk.
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 21:18:04 +0100
Message-ID: <87y707i29v.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de>
References: <4903c066$0$28676$4d3efbfe@news.sover.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: idssi.enyo.de 1225311485 487 212.9.189.177 (29 Oct 2008 20:18:05 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: 
Cancel-Lock: sha1:IRjYEmFahOs5nMLpbF857pcAyMI=
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:2527
Date: 2008-10-29T21:18:04+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

* Peter C. Chapin:

> I don't really have a question or a problem with any of this, but I
> found it curious and I thought I'd post in case someone had some useful
> insight into what might be going on.

Is memory allocation or finalization involved in an inner loop?
It might also help to compare -gnatdg output or assembly (-S).