From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,5ae752c88e0dde5e X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!npeer03.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!nntp.club.cc.cmu.edu!feeder.erje.net!news.szaf.org!news.gnuher.de!rz.uni-karlsruhe.de!feed.news.schlund.de!schlund.de!news.online.de!not-for-mail From: Florian Weimer Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Using representation clauses in networking software Date: Sat, 04 Sep 2010 22:46:54 +0200 Organization: 1&1 Internet AG Message-ID: <87y6bh1bk1.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> References: <8739ugqfeb.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> <43fkp7an4c5m$.3db3n6adym42.dlg@40tude.net> <8739ugkka6.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> <1pjh30gv98n9t$.lycfvhr1l9rz$.dlg@40tude.net> <87tymvhoy5.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> <1x3jdyxqnl1e7.xlqx0giurt0x.dlg@40tude.net> <1uzfyshtk9wpq.1ft0ehpgbw60k.dlg@40tude.net> <1182a142-b95e-4349-bbb5-aa82fbd5da6f@a36g2000yqc.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: p4fe389fb.dip0.t-ipconnect.de Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: online.de 1283633214 31495 79.227.137.251 (4 Sep 2010 20:46:54 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@einsundeins.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 4 Sep 2010 20:46:54 +0000 (UTC) Cancel-Lock: sha1:8bvpldznQQYu64HAVANPZzP4wu8= Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:13950 Date: 2010-09-04T22:46:54+02:00 List-Id: * Maciej Sobczak: > On 15 Sie, 21:15, Simon Wright wrote: > >> Stick to network-byte-order on the wire, > > Just when ~99% of hardware in use is little-endian? > Sounds like a lost optimization opportunity with absolutely no overall > gain. On most CPUs, dealing with misaligned loads when converting from a byte stream is more expensive than the endianness conversion.