From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,998480123ade4649 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Received: by 10.68.59.229 with SMTP id c5mr421432pbr.6.1321911575208; Mon, 21 Nov 2011 13:39:35 -0800 (PST) Path: lh20ni2883pbb.0!nntp.google.com!news2.google.com!goblin1!goblin.stu.neva.ru!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Ludovic Brenta Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: will ada always be supported by gcc? Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2011 22:39:33 +0100 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Message-ID: <87y5v9tasq.fsf@ludovic-brenta.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Injection-Info: mx04.eternal-september.org; posting-host="mHxNLg6gmuMNGmvillPpKw"; logging-data="23362"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/dvzmyFc9fAfOIITJht0KP" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:gxJO2h85aa42LrT6/P8q4efK2/s= sha1:W0cMnhmX4qad/g6Js2geHi7cYb4= Xref: news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:14495 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: 2011-11-21T22:39:33+01:00 List-Id: leo.brewin@internode.on.net writes: > I've been a long time user of Pascal and I'm worried that my compiler > of choice, gpc pascal for MacOSX, may fall over in the next release of > MacOSX. The good folks that have supported gpc Pascal over the years > are unlikely to do the job on an ongoing basis. So I need a plan B > which currently is to port my roughly 1 million lines of code to Ada. > My worry is that I might run into the same problem with Ada -- can I > be sure that Ada will continue to be part of the GCC compiler suite > for a long time? The short answer is: yes. There are two main reasons for that. First, because GCC is Free Software, there will always be the possibility to recompile GCC from sources, or to pay someone like me (:)) to do that for you. Second, the Ada part of GCC is maintained by the company AdaCore, whose customers use GNAT for projects with *very* long life cycles. For example, it is quite normal for avionics equipment (hardware and software) to be supported for 20 years -- still only half the expected life time of the aircraft containing said avionics equipment. And I wouldn't expect anyone to rewrite the controlling software of a working nuclear power station "just because the language is old". But I think your question really was: "can I be sure that Ada will continue to be part of the GCC compiler suite *on MacOS X* for a long time?" I cannot answer that definitively; for starters, Apple's GCC does not support Ada at all; the existing GNAT for MacOS X is pretty much a community project, AFAICT, and so is no better and no worse than GPC on Mac OS X. -- Ludovic Brenta.