From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Bob Duff Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: New to Ada, why these warning messages? Date: Sat, 02 Jan 2016 16:05:29 -0500 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Message-ID: <87y4c7y9nq.fsf@theworld.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="2fe43c8b72467d8691a45b56cebaa39a"; logging-data="31518"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/qm6hxYe+l/Ni/K0FSLQ2m" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:L6KkKRdZsUp+3X0rh+o6dO1hwlI= sha1:lzL7A35cc28lyJUSoF4GlPYPSec= Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:28983 Date: 2016-01-02T16:05:29-05:00 List-Id: "Jeffrey R. Carter" writes: > We have hard data across multiple application domains showing that deployed C > has 4 times the errors of deployed Ada. Do you have a cite for that? (I know about the Steve Ziegler paper.) - Bob