From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,897417b380f5731e X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Florian Weimer Subject: Re: STL, Ada, C++ (Was Re: The Next Microsoft?) Date: 2000/05/08 Message-ID: <87wvl5sj3e.fsf@deneb.cygnus.argh.org>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 620546927 References: <8eg37k$15n$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <8epkoa$b8b$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <8eu0ob$7qv$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <391328F0.1221@synquiry.com> <39133213.64A@Ganymede.com> Mail-Copies-To: never Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Complaints-To: abuse@cygnus.argh.org X-Trace: deneb.cygnus.argh.org 957763925 759 192.168.1.2 (8 May 2000 05:32:05 GMT) Organization: Penguin on board User-Agent: Gnus/5.0807 (Gnus v5.8.7) Emacs/20.6 Mime-Version: 1.0 Reply-To: Florian Weimer NNTP-Posting-Date: 8 May 2000 05:32:05 GMT Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 2000-05-08T05:32:05+00:00 List-Id: Brian Rogoff writes: > > Ada must have something like it, since Stepanov ported STL from Ada to > > C++. > > There are Ada versions of STL-like libraries, Is there any such library which doesn't duplicate the original STL iterator semantics? An STL iterator which denotes the end of a range points to an element after the last element included in the range. This differs from the Standard Ada approach for arrays, and I fear that mixing both conventions results in code which is a bit irritating at least.