From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,77f1de37204ed8a6
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-06-05 01:21:05 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!newsfeed.google.com!sn-xit-02!supernews.com!isdnet!newscore.gigabell.net!newsfeed.hanau.net!news-fra1.dfn.de!news-koe1.dfn.de!news.rhrz.uni-bonn.de!news.uni-stuttgart.de!news.belwue.de!LF.net!news.enyo.de!news1.enyo.de!not-for-mail
From: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Operator visibility question
Date: 05 Jun 2001 00:12:35 +0200
Organization: Enyo's not your organization
Message-ID: <87wv6revxo.fsf@deneb.enyo.de>
References: <ba18d5cb.0106030548.62aa45e2@posting.google.com>
 <87hexx34kt.fsf@deneb.enyo.de> <M8OS6.3850$v4.184333@www.newsranger.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:8126
Date: 2001-06-05T00:12:35+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Ted Dennison<dennison@telepath.com> writes:

> In article <87hexx34kt.fsf@deneb.enyo.de>, Florian Weimer says...
>>
>>If one argument of a comparison operator is a universal integer,
>>a universal real, a string, or an aggregate, then the visibility
>>check is not performed.
> 
> Hmmm. That makes me wonder exactly which "<" the compiler is using when it
> generates the code?

The one which is not visible. ;-)

If there's no matching operator, I don't think the code in question is
reached at all.