From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,bc1361a952ec75ca X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-08-27 03:50:12 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!newsfeed.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!130.133.1.3!fu-berlin.de!news.cid.net!news.enyo.de!news1.enyo.de!not-for-mail From: Florian Weimer Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: simple CPUs, was Re: How Ada could have prevented the Red Code distributed denial of service attack. Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 13:08:14 +0200 Organization: Enyo's not your organization Message-ID: <87wv3poj4x.fsf@deneb.enyo.de> References: <9lr3tt$4gr$1@nh.pace.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:12456 Date: 2001-08-27T13:08:14+02:00 List-Id: tmoran@acm.org writes: > I wonder how much performance loss there would be if you eliminated > all the fancy pipelining etc etc from a Pentium IV, in order to simplify > timing estimates? As much as 1/2? Continue to run at 1GHz, of course. If you eliminate the pipeline from the Pentium IV, I don't think you can still run it at 1 GHz. (BTW, a local computer dealer advertised the Pentium IV, referring to its much longer pipeline length in comparison to the Pentium III. ;-)