From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,13b7917466f2d19
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-10-10 09:22:25 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!newsfeeds.belnet.be!news.belnet.be!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!newsfeed.r-kom.de!newsfeed.stueberl.de!newsfeed.vmunix.org!newsfeed2.easynews.net!easynews.net!news.cid.net!news.enyo.de!news1.enyo.de!not-for-mail
From: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: GNAT and GCC 3.0
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2001 18:30:22 +0200
Organization: Enyo's not your organization
Message-ID: <87wv23fof5.fsf@deneb.enyo.de>
References: <9a575af3.0110020747.2304ce86@posting.google.com>
 <5ee5b646.0110022002.7ccde025@posting.google.com>
 <m3vghvau6m.fsf@yakisoba.forte-intl.com>
 <5ee5b646.0110060639.31567261@posting.google.com>
 <m3669r79m7.fsf@yakisoba.forte-intl.com>
 <iI4w7.8665$9h6.2944314573@newssvr30.news.prodigy.com>
 <9pr6e8$aai1@news.cis.okstate.edu>
 <%biw7.8780$H81.3054034106@newssvr30.news.prodigy.com>
 <m3g08sil5p.fsf@yakisoba.forte-intl.com>
 <5ee5b646.0110092211.a69a5f@posting.google.com>
 <m3669o0y2u.fsf@yakisoba.forte-inOrganization: LJK Software
 <TcK5AtkXbXj1@eisner.encompasserve.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:14169
Date: 2001-10-10T18:30:22+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Kilgallen@SpamCop.net (Larry Kilgallen) writes:

> So who was the customer who was "threatened" ?  RMS ?

I don't think so.  After all, RMS didn't try to close down the GCC CVS
after the Red Hat GCC 2.96 incident.