From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,4eca860272d4832b X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news2.google.com!news1.google.com!news3.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local01.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.scarlet.biz!news.scarlet.biz.POSTED!not-for-mail NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2007 14:15:27 -0600 From: Ludovic Brenta Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Static vs dynamic evaluation anomaly? References: <12shen4qjhv41a7@corp.supernews.com> <1170792077.235994.10900@q2g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2007 21:15:27 +0100 Message-ID: <87wt2vgi00.fsf@ludovic-brenta.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:0fpMBJ0yKdfhhWjzmPx/eETghv8= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii NNTP-Posting-Host: 62.235.218.89 X-Trace: sv3-Ic15MyYJYqvPZiC9VqW0p2HqDA5/XaWsFmJV9APSA4wbM3IuPhFm/8+7QN6dG0qqXekrYnOCtSCcUzL!R8ekqQwzv0n/DQtpW0evuGXpQYcBn03UxCQ2I5nIFoUYq8SE+p0sGPHlsMcze9Kuo/cJCn4Oug== X-Complaints-To: abuse@scarlet.be X-DMCA-Complaints-To: abuse@scarlet.biz X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.3.32 Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:9037 Date: 2007-02-06T21:15:27+01:00 List-Id: Adam Beneschan writes: > On Feb 6, 9:29 am, Matt Jaffe wrote: > >> Any further help in explaining these anomalies would be much >> appreciated. (It's always possible we've stumbled across a >> compiler bug; but I am reluctant to come to that conclusion >> prematurely.) > > I'm not so reluctant. It's a compiler bug. Confirmed on Debian gnat 4.1.1-22. -- Ludovic Brenta.