From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,1f0967a619e5d83e
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!feeder1-2.proxad.net!proxad.net!feeder1-1.proxad.net!feeder.news-service.com!feeder3.cambrium.nl!feed.tweaknews.nl!not-for-mail
From: Ludovic Brenta <ludovic@ludovic-brenta.org>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Ada checks suppression thanks to compilation options and Ada
 conformity
References: <4733972C.C7E7BCE@free.fr>
Date: Fri, 09 Nov 2007 00:52:54 +0100
Message-ID: <87wsss5m7d.fsf@ludovic-brenta.org>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:qjSog7NhhJeK3ptFkOV1At6pryg=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Organization: Tele2
X-Trace: 
 DXC=XMY`mhCe?^YmV7l299H<g\6`Y6aWje^YZc08F1Nb`YTSjZPG9hJLZ?ZdZ\mV\bcG6\^6hVN^^Z_ZS
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:18223
Date: 2007-11-09T00:52:54+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Christophe TRAVERS writes:
> From my point of view, these compilation options that can suppress
> the checks are a way to get around the Ada language norm.

You are correct.  See ARM 1.1.5(6) and 1.1.5(12).

-- 
Ludovic Brenta.