From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,13c7ec19f3c43155
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!news.belwue.de!LF.net!news.enyo.de!not-for-mail
From: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: speed of generic code in Ada (vs Java)
Date: Fri, 23 May 2008 00:01:38 +0200
Message-ID: <87wslmath9.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de>
References: 
 <9e9bdae7-5e91-4e0c-b783-1ed72311a733@t12g2000prg.googlegroups.com>
	<2e1de55a-69e5-439e-addc-bde650b4c16a@i36g2000prf.googlegroups.com>
	<87wsluulj4.fsf@ludovic-brenta.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: idssi.enyo.de 1211493698 11393 212.9.189.177 (22 May 2008 22:01:38
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: 
Cancel-Lock: sha1:UF+6wHbW9Ju13sGJ5z6dYWP47Ek=
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:298
Date: 2008-05-23T00:01:38+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

* Ludovic Brenta:

> To add to Jim's excellent answer: Ada got it right the first time,
> back in 1980.

Huh? Ada was designed to permit both implementation models (shared and
reified generics).