From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Paul Rubin Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: If not Ada, what else... Date: Sun, 19 Jul 2015 14:15:25 -0700 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Message-ID: <87wpxvyhle.fsf@jester.gateway.sonic.net> References: <64bc671c-72e5-4924-b703-3b907c69949c@googlegroups.com> <877fq9uj6g.fsf@theworld.com> <65061686-5c8f-433b-9b11-9e228298158e@googlegroups.com> <87k2u96jms.fsf@jester.gateway.sonic.net> <06f8a6f9-d219-4d40-b9ac-8518e93839bd@googlegroups.com> <87y4io63jy.fsf@jester.gateway.sonic.net> <7a29d3e9-d1bd-4f4a-b1a6-14d3e1a83a4d@googlegroups.com> <87mvz36fen.fsf@jester.gateway.sonic.net> <2215b44f-8a89-47c6-a4c4-52b74d2dac45@googlegroups.com> <9e492c82-868d-43d3-a18a-38274400e337@googlegroups.com> <40184feb-4053-4ac3-8eaa-c3bd9cd8a77c@googlegroups.com> <10272577-945f-4682-85bc-8ad47f3653ae@googlegroups.com> <4ae21218-2148-434b-8acc-162f1cce594f@googlegroups.com> <874ml0yv84.fsf@jester.gateway.sonic.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="d4217d68945dedf510265c644f2a7daa"; logging-data="31584"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/p9LA87mNhXkzipD0/Twyx" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:W5zywoRvlLW/4ToJV7jd+UIhB6w= sha1:DyoDlHNmrOqogEGmf+gBlUYLunU= Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:26892 Date: 2015-07-19T14:15:25-07:00 List-Id: "Jeffrey R. Carter" writes: > Yes, GNAT is, AFAIK, the only implementation of Ada 12. There have > been no announcements here of any other implementations. Thanks, that is interesting. How on earth did Ada 12 get through the standardization process if none of the other compiler vendors were on board? Usually those committees have representatives from all the involved companies, with everyone trying to get their feature in.