From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Why are Ada compilers difficult to write ?
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2018 14:08:47 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID: <87wour97a8.fsf@nightsong.com>
References: <584564c2-9f64-4965-b045-535cdaf899c0@googlegroups.com>
	<pgdtbd$7pd$1@dont-email.me>
	<7cb22c58-3009-47f0-8fe7-62f3cd61785d@googlegroups.com>
	<52b14af1-ee0a-40af-871a-beeced6bce1c@googlegroups.com>
	<f84fbda6-34e8-440c-bcf5-2b8ddf03f359@googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org;
 posting-host="ad29184235ab732182ffa6f5cbcacb90";
	logging-data="6156"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";
	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+heuWpE8Wc3jGqnKWjhvTC"
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.3 (gnu/linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:XhZud31k7sE27HMbdS7yqRYcmow=
	sha1:pqBP5QDdmaPYAJ2fWGGlE+gveDU=
Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:53233
Date: 2018-06-21T14:08:47-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

"Dan'l Miller" <optikos@verizon.net> writes:
> Does there even exist a major (either commercial or FOSS)
> well-maintained-all-the-way-to-C11 •C-only• compiler anymore that is
> not also a C++ complier?

I don't know what counts as "major" and I'm not sure if the entirety of
C11 is present, but I use SDCC sometimes (sdcc.sourceforge.net) and it
supports at least some of C11.  It has a substantial user base in the
embedded dev community.