From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FROMSPACE,
	FROM_ADDR_WS,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
	version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,64815469c35bbcbe
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: " "@deneb.cygnus.argh.org (Florian Weimer)
Subject: Re: GNAT: pragma Ravenscar
Date: 1999/11/30
Message-ID: <87vh6j4tpo.fsf@deneb.cygnus.argh.org>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 555171695
References: <38440543.DE6747F3@icn.siemens.de>
Mail-Copies-To: never
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Complaints-To: abuse@cygnus.argh.org
X-Trace: deneb.cygnus.argh.org 943993235 4609 192.168.1.2 (30 Nov 1999
 20:20:35 GMT)
Organization: Penguin on board
User-Agent: Gnus/5.070099 (Pterodactyl Gnus v0.99) Emacs/20.4
Mime-Version: 1.0
NNTP-Posting-Date: 30 Nov 1999 20:20:35 GMT
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1999-11-30T20:20:35+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Alfred Hilscher <Alfred.Hilscher@icn.siemens.de> writes:

> I thought when I build the same program twice, once with this pragma and
> again without this pragma then I would get different sized exe-files
> (because a smaller runtime included). But when I did so, I've got both
> times the same size. Do I missunderstand what the pragma does or do I
> miss some GNAT switches ? I've looked to the documentation but I found
> no answer there.

The GNAT No Runtime support (GNORT) doesn't seem to be part of the
public distribution.

(Of course, this is a GNAT-specific question and should have been asked
on chat@gnat.com. ;)