From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,b3df91c5d77c33bb X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-11-01 03:44:28 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!newsfeeds.belnet.be!news.belnet.be!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!dns.phoenix-ag.de!news.uni-stuttgart.de!news.fh-hannover.de!news.cid.net!news.enyo.de!news1.enyo.de!not-for-mail From: Florian Weimer Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Emacs Language Sensitive Editing Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2001 12:58:39 +0100 Organization: Enyo's not your organization Message-ID: <87vggu66ts.fsf@deneb.enyo.de> References: <9rodvs$2kh$1@infosun2.rus.uni-stuttgart.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:15532 Date: 2001-11-01T12:58:39+01:00 List-Id: David Bolen writes: [ESC] > And it works fine over any remote protocols, since it's just a > standard individual ASCII code. Not quite true. Some keys are represented by escape sequences, and if network quality results in delays between the ESC and the following characters, funny things can happen.