From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,46f70a964ea219b1,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-12-27 04:00:25 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!fu-berlin.de!news.cid.net!news.enyo.de!news1.enyo.de!not-for-mail
From: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Releasing Aliased Variables
Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2001 13:26:10 +0100
Organization: Enyo's not your organization
Message-ID: <87vgesrgrh.fsf@deneb.enyo.de>
References: <3AA692A8.F1283C27@netscape.net> <wccsnkpi8qb.fsf@world.std.com>
 <87bsrcs8a3.fsf@deneb.enyo.de> <LOMp6.295$cZ1.274918@nnrp2.sbc.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cancel-Lock: sha1:IRiZ8BMOmSycxhky0uVHCTzdWq4=
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:18331
Date: 2001-12-27T13:26:10+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

"Pat Rogers" <progers@NOclasswideSPAM.com> writes:

> > Some time ago, there was a thread in which someone explained (I think
> > Robert Dewar) that 'aliased' does not provide any help to the compiler
> > regarding alias detection, register allocation etc. because the
> > compiler has to be able to determine this kind of information anyway
> > if an Address attribute is used.
> 
> Did you mean "Access" instead of "Address"?

No, I didn't.  That's the point.