From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,28dcfc3d6dc519b8
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-02-14 08:01:05 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!colt.net!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!newsfeed.r-kom.de!newsfeed.stueberl.de!newsfeed.vmunix.org!newsfeed2.easynews.net!easynews.net!news.cid.net!news.enyo.de!not-for-mail
From: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Renaming subprogram and default_expression
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2002 16:58:19 +0100
Organization: Enyo -- not your organization
Message-ID: <87vgd0gin8.fsf@deneb.enyo.de>
References: <mailman.1013687581.29134.comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org>
 <87sn84i80s.fsf@deneb.enyo.de>
 <a4gfvm$qek$1@nets3.rz.RWTH-Aachen.DE> <87zo2cgkib.fsf@deneb.enyo.de>
 <a4gm4p$3fr$1@nets3.rz.RWTH-Aachen.DE>
NNTP-Posting-Host: deneb.enyo.de
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: cygnus.enyo.de 1013702242 10219 212.9.189.171 (14 Feb 2002 15:57:22
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@enyo.de
NNTP-Posting-Date: 14 Feb 2002 15:57:22 GMT
Cancel-Lock: sha1:R4CID8Hs5KHAoc+jyilJBybOGJo=
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:20007
Date: 2002-02-14T15:57:22+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

"Alexander Boucke" <alexb@lufmech.rwth-aachen.de> writes:

> Type roman is range 1..3999; is defined in strings edit.ads Note,
> that gnat3.14p does not complain about the preset values for the
> booelan arguments, only for the new integer type. If I comment these
> default values, the program compiles. This seems to be the same
> error as in the short testprog. starting this thread: A new
> integer-type was used there, too.

You can eliminate the integer type.  The minimal test case for GCC 3.1
is:

procedure Defaults is

   procedure Original (X : Integer);
   procedure Renamed (X : Integer := -1);

   procedure Renamed (X : Integer := -1)
     renames Original;

   procedure Original (X : Integer) is
   begin
      null;
   end Original;

begin
   null;
end Defaults;

(I wouldn't have thought that such basic things are broken, that's why
I had not tried the default Integer type.)

I don't know why the bug doesn't occur with string types.  Oh well.