From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,2e86351fb0d532e
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!news2.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!feedme.ziplink.net!news.swapon.de!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Ludovic Brenta <ludovic@ludovic-brenta.org>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Bug in gnat-4.4
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 22:38:47 +0200
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID: <87vd4zs0bs.fsf@ludovic-brenta.org>
References: 
 <f736e99b-4094-4698-875b-a2031fd6384c@g28g2000pra.googlegroups.com>
	<19e597vj3gojp.1t2ys58wl8lj7$.dlg@40tude.net>
	<aa38b9db-fc7d-435e-b6ea-c94aeaca5522@h7g2000yqn.googlegroups.com>
	<10yl9b2ysrfj5$.10wfkseadielx$.dlg@40tude.net>
	<bec572ec-5340-460f-affd-768a50635f7a@d17g2000yqm.googlegroups.com>
	<jwo1dfx5mv6$.doqx1rkdjx6a.dlg@40tude.net>
	<87zkubs2yj.fsf_-_@ludovic-brenta.org>
	<1widfgg1w9k9t$.r1ng0dv38z7m$.dlg@40tude.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Injection-Info: mx03.eternal-september.org;
 posting-host="bMd9K8+wxDv+nXggUv0U+w";
	logging-data="21267"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";
	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX193uDxp7imi8NY7UmZNw99f"
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:+ixzsz9svVVWkiOn8NEzwxDTNZw=
	sha1:5MNAcdAikH7VCS3NIw+i1iIcsgw=
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:15586
Date: 2010-10-18T22:38:47+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

"Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> writes:
> On Mon, 18 Oct 2010 21:41:56 +0200, Ludovic Brenta wrote:
>> No Program_Error.
>
> Good news!
>
>> Are you sure this is the correct way to reproduce your bug?
>
> Yes, it is. But I have gnat-4.4.4-4.

That means your bug was really #589164, as I suspected.  The backport
for the fix is in -5.

> apt-get update/upgrade keeps it old.  I'll try aptitude
> dist-upgrade. How wonderful it is to have a dozen utilities for doing
> the same thing...

Since all these utilities use the same apt back-end, they all give the
same results.  What do you have in /etc/apt/sources.list?

-- 
Ludovic Brenta.