From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,232e89dd4cc3c154 X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news2.google.com!news2.google.com!goblin3!goblin.stu.neva.ru!news.szaf.org!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Phil Carmody Newsgroups: sci.math,comp.lang.c,comp.lang.fortran,comp.lang.pl1,comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: KISS4691, a potentially top-ranked RNG. Date: 29 Jun 2011 19:48:48 +0300 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Sender: phil@bazspaz.fatphil.org Message-ID: <87vcvo7fdb.fsf@bazspaz.fatphil.org> References: <4dae2a4b$0$55577$c30e37c6@exi-reader.telstra.net> <4dbd6e9c$0$12957$892e0abb@auth.newsreader.octanews.com> <925saiFj03U7@mid.individual.net> <4dbe2304$0$12961$892e0abb@auth.newsreader.octanews.com> <4dda0486$0$67782$c30e37c6@exi-reader.telstra.net> <4dda09ca$0$6629$9b4e6d93@newsspool2.arcor-online.net> <4e098093$0$79550$c30e37c6@exi-reader.telstra.net> <1bei2e54d4.fsf@snowball.wb.pfeifferfamily.net> <1baad16gre.fsf@snowball.wb.pfeifferfamily.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Injection-Info: mx04.eternal-september.org; posting-host="A8KpN8k3FkxHwF32eOLgMA"; logging-data="9490"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+8Y98LOlXSkMUIGUdEyUvi" User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.4 Cancel-Lock: sha1:VMCLnV0eH6GN3JYsdbFAtwl40MM= Xref: g2news2.google.com sci.math:242288 comp.lang.c:130855 comp.lang.fortran:44955 comp.lang.pl1:2716 comp.lang.ada:21030 Date: 2011-06-29T19:48:48+03:00 List-Id: James Kuyper writes: > On 06/28/2011 12:51 PM, Joe Pfeiffer wrote: > > Chris H writes: > ... > > So, rather than blanket statements regarding the unreliability of wikis, > > or anecdotes regarding your friend the expert, are you claiming the > > wikipedia author mis-quoted the statistics? Or do you have a "more > > reliable" source that says says something different? > > He's been asked several times now whether he has a more reliable source, > and he hasn't bothered responding to those questions. Au contraire - he responded. In the same way that a dead frog's leg responds to a galvanic impulse. Phil -- "At least you know where you are with Microsoft." "True. I just wish I'd brought a paddle." -- Matthew Vernon