From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID,
	MSGID_RANDY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,e7e108bbafde0f02
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: reason67@my-deja.com
Subject: Re: Constraint or what?
Date: 2000/02/10
Message-ID: <87uojc$gav$1@nnrp1.deja.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 584080765
References: <38A2A395.FD028B73@alcatel.be>
X-Http-Proxy: NetCache@www-blv-proxy4.boeing.com: Version NetApp Release
 3.4D6: Mon Aug 23 16:40:19 PDT 1999-Solaris,
 1.0 x24.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 12.13.226.14
Organization: Deja.com - Before you buy.
X-Article-Creation-Date: Thu Feb 10 16:22:11 2000 GMT
X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDreason67
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.5 [en]C-CCK-MCD Boeing Kit (Win95; I)
Date: 2000-02-10T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <38A2A395.FD028B73@alcatel.be>,
  Jan.Wuyts@alcatel.be wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> We're doing a port Alsys -> VADS or whatever they are called these
> days.  This maybe a stupid question but I'll take the risk.
>
> The Alsys didn't complain on the construct below but the VADS one
does.
> I know about the restrictions on UNCHECKED_CONVERSION and the VADS
> documentation says the target type cannot be an unconstraint array but
I
> assumed it was constraint.  So, why does the VADS compiler issue an
> error...

I have seen this warning message in VADS and Apex (Same company). It is
only a warning and should be disregarded. It brings it up based on the
base type which is unconstrained, not the subtype which is.
---
Jeffrey Blatt


Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.