From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,e67a94e45ae33316
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-09-05 14:21:33 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!newsfeed.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!193.174.75.178!news-fra1.dfn.de!news-koe1.dfn.de!news-han1.dfn.de!news.fh-hannover.de!news.cid.net!news.enyo.de!news1.enyo.de!not-for-mail
From: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Another good URL for all you C++ haters
Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2001 23:25:15 +0200
Organization: Enyo's not your organization
Message-ID: <87u1yhmitg.fsf@deneb.enyo.de>
References: <3b9604b1.10736828@news.geccs.gecm.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:12774
Date: 2001-09-05T23:25:15+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

chris.m.moore@amsjv.com (Chris M. Moore) writes:

>   Even Floyd, who loves the language, admits that, "Its greatest
>   weaknesses is a flaw in the interface/implementation separation. A
>   class exposes its private data/methods to the world and a programmer
>   must use some tricks (that should be supported directly in the
>   language) to overcome this."

Doesn't have Ada a similar problem?