From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,104df2b9b7a2f689 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!news2.google.com!proxad.net!newsfeed.stueberl.de!feed.news.tiscali.de!news.belwue.de!LF.net!news.enyo.de!not-for-mail From: Florian Weimer Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Interfaces Date: Tue, 17 May 2005 12:57:51 +0200 Message-ID: <87u0l26rww.fsf@deneb.enyo.de> References: <8764xj9wzf.fsf@deneb.enyo.de> <877jhz0y52.fsf@deneb.enyo.de> <87sm0mcjbx.fsf@deneb.enyo.de> <1rfnp5x3lxi3n$.mvahuo5ag68a$.dlg@40tude.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: albireo.enyo.de 1116327475 5257 212.9.189.177 (17 May 2005 10:57:55 GMT) X-Complaints-To: Cancel-Lock: sha1:bAIBlc25YvxQEDxgt/XwNzcdIl8= Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:11064 Date: 2005-05-17T12:57:51+02:00 List-Id: * Dmitry A. Kazakov: >>> That alone would not help much. Consider you have overridden J1.Foo and >>> J2.Foo using different implementations, then which one will be called on >>> Foo (X)? >> >> How would this be possible in the single-inheritance-with-interfaces >> model? > > There cannot be any feasible single inheritance / multiple interface model. > Any inheritance is either single or multiple. Implementation vs. interface > inheritance is an orthogonal issue. That's why I don't understand your question. The condition is always false, isn't it?