From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,3e26dfa741e64e5f X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newscon06.news.prodigy.com!prodigy.net!news-FFM2.ecrc.net!news-mue1.dfn.de!news-stu1.dfn.de!news.belwue.de!LF.net!news.enyo.de!not-for-mail From: Florian Weimer Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: GNAT GPL 2005 Edition is now available Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2005 18:10:04 +0200 Message-ID: <87u0gibbmr.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> References: <432919be$0$10539$4d4eb98e@read.news.fr.uu.net> <1126773856.876636.265130@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> <1126794444.071827.191320@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com> <432994ac$0$27554$9b4e6d93@newsread4.arcor-online.net> <4329a4c4$0$2103$9b4e6d93@newsread2.arcor-online.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: albireo.enyo.de 1127059811 25185 212.9.189.177 (18 Sep 2005 16:10:11 GMT) Cancel-Lock: sha1:6HmOIgvZjTlnZX/OjvTfYAd7w58= Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:4867 Date: 2005-09-18T18:10:04+02:00 List-Id: * Georg Bauhaus: > GNAT Pro users have indicated a cost of $$$$ or more, not just > $$$. I think that's at least the same price range as Aonix, > Greenhills, or IBM. (insert standard disclaimer) $$$$ is not a real problem, either, at least in countries which have a high per-job overhead. 8-) The problem is that below a certain number of developers, you can't get support for GNAT from AdaCore. The other companies around GCC aren't able to offer support, either. I don't know how much it costs to get one of your developers involved in GNAT development. It would probably take a couple of months, something you might not be able to afford. I still think Ada is a fine language, and GNAT is a great compiler, but right now, circumstances seem to restrict me to x86 on Linux, probably uniprocessor only. This makes me feel uneasy.