From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,ae0c567a4b40a4ee
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!news3.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local01.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.scarlet.biz!news.scarlet.biz.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 05 Jul 2006 14:37:07 -0500
From: Ludovic Brenta <ludovic@ludovic-brenta.org>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Ada bindings to Linux GUI toolkits ?
References: <rJV9Q9jiCapj@eisner.encompasserve.org>
	<d63bdlwuy3.fsf@hod.lan.m-e-leypold.de>
	<MqDHu199+8Li@eisner.encompasserve.org>
	<czeqg.18119$FQ1.5372@attbi_s71>
	<irwtauteu0.fsf@hod.lan.m-e-leypold.de>
	<1152008348.232785.108800@p79g2000cwp.googlegroups.com>
	<m2psglp0jh.fsf@grendel.local>
Date: Wed, 05 Jul 2006 21:37:21 +0200
Message-ID: <87u05vetce.fsf@ludovic-brenta.org>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:/CO/0LIvSlGPjcHHJuirOXOvx1Q=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
NNTP-Posting-Host: 62.235.237.82
X-Trace: 
 sv3-XlJ/XR7EMvVvpjKKNB08WrbLp+ZmohFEt6yZ9ODVmJoVvnKZRLj/47jnhu578Z+1xs1nkT7Jio1nqe9!POJxGxklo1FBoVAp2TMFAK1wcY//IFrzj2yjG4xU65iEUmoeDOrl8yzyNup+rlyYHWS+06WUVg==
X-Complaints-To: abuse@scarlet.be
X-DMCA-Complaints-To: abuse@scarlet.biz
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint
 properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.32
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:5512
Date: 2006-07-05T21:37:21+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Simon Wright <simon@pushface.org> writes:

> "Ludovic Brenta" <ludovic@ludovic-brenta.org> writes:
>
>> The number 1 requirement, as far as Debian is concerned, is that
>> GtkAda must be suitable for supporting GPS.
>
> Which of course doesn't require GMGPL. (I expect this has been said
> already, but ..)

No, but it implies that it may be impractical to support a GMGPL
version (namely 2.4.0) of GtkAda in Debian.

-- 
Ludovic Brenta.