From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,bdebc54a485c13a4
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Received: by 10.68.125.233 with SMTP id mt9mr7249599pbb.5.1333399889313;
        Mon, 02 Apr 2012 13:51:29 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 r9ni11256pbh.0!nntp.google.com!news2.google.com!news.glorb.com!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx04.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Ludovic Brenta <ludovic@ludovic-brenta.org>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: My first compiler bug: work around or redesign?
Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2012 22:51:28 +0200
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID: <87ty11yi0f.fsf@ludovic-brenta.org>
References: <slrnjmp96d.1lme.lithiumcat@sigil.instinctive.eu>
	<slrnjn1ch7.1lme.lithiumcat@sigil.instinctive.eu>
	<2229037.332.1332788108220.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@vbht7>
	<slrnjn6bki.1lme.lithiumcat@sigil.instinctive.eu>
	<19538743.70.1333009514665.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@ynes7>
	<efa01e7e-70f2-46ec-8411-bdf2662c7e26@a5g2000vbl.googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Injection-Info: mx04.eternal-september.org;
 posting-host="v5iVQNrfuFHP48V5kyTvQg";
	logging-data="29671"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";
	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19GDfae+Grzdw0A9yzoMG83"
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (gnu/linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:JuPTEAz6ygLGMPxKCA+i3RETTBA=
	sha1:4/6Wiy1TuDgdZRSypY8fEmhpwAM=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: 2012-04-02T22:51:28+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

onox writes on comp.lang.ada:
> Ludovic Brenta wrote:
>>> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52752
>> which pointed me tohttp://gcc.gnu.org/PR52735
>>
>> So you should indicate that your bug is a duplicate with a more
>> minimal test case.
>
> It seems the error is triggered in a different .c file with GPL 2010:

If you have not already, please add that information to the bug reports
in the Bugzilla database.  The part about different optimization levels
triggering the bug in different ways is particularly relevant.

-- 
Ludovic Brenta.