From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Bob Duff Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: New to Ada, why these warning messages? Date: Sat, 02 Jan 2016 16:08:55 -0500 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Message-ID: <87twmvy9i0.fsf@theworld.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="2fe43c8b72467d8691a45b56cebaa39a"; logging-data="31518"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX180gx3YgW3wvl2UaIRYYiE7" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:KQ2iXZCSyfTGmM0MwORXuaagxjk= sha1:+21cTmXh5cy3+xY9LxKlRvAa9fY= Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:28985 Date: 2016-01-02T16:08:55-05:00 List-Id: Dennis Lee Bieber writes: >...Pascal User Manual and Report By Jensen and Wirth. >... -- which > may give you an idea of how much stuff Ada added over Pascal, and why the > books are so thick). Yes, but another reason for the size difference is that the above-mentioned Pascal book is rather informal (to put it politely). The Ada RM actually tries to get all the details nailed down correctly (and mostly succeeds). - Bob