From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!gandalf.srv.welterde.de!news.jacob-sparre.dk!loke.jacob-sparre.dk!pnx.dk!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Jacob Sparre Andersen <sparre@nbi.dk>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: timer_server triggers Task_Termination handler
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 20:20:33 +0200
Organization: JSA Research & Innovation
Message-ID: <87twiult72.fsf@adaheads.consafe1.org>
References: <nfa9nm$bkc$1@loke.gir.dk>
	<86d4c5fa-5ead-41ac-b139-449ed9d89d89@googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 109.56.230.181.mobile.3.dk
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: loke.gir.dk 1461262833 24602 109.56.230.181 (21 Apr 2016 18:20:33
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: news@jacob-sparre.dk
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 18:20:33 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.4 (gnu/linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:LSzkUu2MlWIEPpJd77Ki8tRSU/A=
Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:30220
Date: 2016-04-21T20:20:33+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Anh Vo wrote:

> On Thursday, April 21, 2016 at 3:23:51 AM UTC-7, Per Dalgas Jakobsen wrote:
>> Is it correct behaviour when tasks internal to the GNAT run-time causes 
>> users task_termination handlers to be called?
>  
> Yes, this is correct behavior. See C.7.3 of the Ada Reference Manual,

I can't see anywhere in section C.7.3, which allows the compiler to
insert "spontaneous" calls to the termination handlers.

Greetings,

Jacob
-- 
"We will be restoring normality as soon as we are sure what is normal anyway."