From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID,
	MSGID_RANDY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,dbbfdf636aaea0f8
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: reason67@my-deja.com
Subject: Re: modular arithmetic bug in gnat?
Date: 2000/02/09
Message-ID: <87smrj$1bk$1@nnrp1.deja.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 583804390
References: <38A144A0.141EA33F@chelmsford.com>
X-Http-Proxy: NetCache@www-blv-proxy5.boeing.com: Version NetApp Release
 3.4D6: Mon Aug 23 16:40:19 PDT 1999-Solaris,
 1.0 x42.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 12.13.226.15
Organization: Deja.com - Before you buy.
X-Article-Creation-Date: Wed Feb 09 21:40:03 2000 GMT
X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDreason67
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.5 [en]C-CCK-MCD Boeing Kit (Win95; I)
Date: 2000-02-09T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <38A144A0.141EA33F@chelmsford.com>,
  David Shochat <shochat@chelmsford.com> wrote:

> The same program on Rational Apex (3.2.0b, HP-UX 11.0) gives 1416
which
> is what you get if you reduce mod 2**16 immediately after the
> multiplication but before the division.
>
> Do you agree?

Have you tried recompiling it with no optimization to see if you get the
expected results?
---
Jeffrey Blatt


Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.