From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,104df2b9b7a2f689
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!news2.google.com!proxad.net!newsfeed.stueberl.de!feed.news.tiscali.de!news.belwue.de!LF.net!news.enyo.de!not-for-mail
From: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Interfaces
Date: Tue, 17 May 2005 11:06:42 +0200
Message-ID: <87sm0mcjbx.fsf@deneb.enyo.de>
References: <8764xj9wzf.fsf@deneb.enyo.de>
	<wccoebbj8ta.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com> <877jhz0y52.fsf@deneb.enyo.de>
	<u6vv4ln27lyc.1px2yomwawcs2.dlg@40tude.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: albireo.enyo.de 1116320806 19502 212.9.189.177 (17 May 2005 09:06:46
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: 
Cancel-Lock: sha1:ScCiqyEXN+I5c7NccC0kUQ11a6E=
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:11059
Date: 2005-05-17T11:06:42+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

* Dmitry A. Kazakov:

>> Something like "overriding J1
>> procedure Foo"?  This would result in an error message if Foo also
>> overrode a subprogram inherited from T or J2.
>
> That alone would not help much. Consider you have overridden J1.Foo and
> J2.Foo using different implementations, then which one will be called on
> Foo (X)?

How would this be possible in the single-inheritance-with-interfaces
model?