From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,1d6e3c069f70fa5a X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!proxad.net!newsfeed.stueberl.de!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!news.belwue.de!LF.net!news.enyo.de!not-for-mail From: Florian Weimer Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: "Do not use" feature list for GNAT Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2005 15:09:59 +0200 Message-ID: <87slwzfplk.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> References: <877jecppv2.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> <12keizkixzp7c$.1v5nefxoumphe$.dlg@40tude.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: albireo.enyo.de 1124889008 26742 212.9.189.177 (24 Aug 2005 13:10:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: Cancel-Lock: sha1:hW9sgJMHU1c5GbWsBuOsMvfiHqA= Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:4280 Date: 2005-08-24T15:09:59+02:00 List-Id: * Dmitry A. Kazakov: > P.S. What if users of free GNAT grounded a non-profit organization with > some small subscription. If it collected enough money, it could become a > paying customer of ACT, solely to report bugs. In my dealings with AdaCore, they were very explicit letting me know that they don't want such support-by-proxy schemes. Such an organisation should rather fund development on the FSF GCC tree, IMHO, even though this is somewhat unrealistic because of the scale of the task.