From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,5efeb51ce0b50b63 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!news.glorb.com!blackbush.cw.net!cw.net!news.rh-tec.net!news.belwue.de!LF.net!news.enyo.de!not-for-mail From: Florian Weimer Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: GNAT GPL 2005 Edition Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2005 18:45:17 +0200 Message-ID: <87slw29vfm.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> References: <1126619435.487674.77550@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: albireo.enyo.de 1127061923 25924 212.9.189.177 (18 Sep 2005 16:45:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: Cancel-Lock: sha1:uhMsNSRAmzAqEddZuA5ZCJ7ktjU= Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:4872 Date: 2005-09-18T18:45:17+02:00 List-Id: * David Trudgett: > It occurs to me that removing this exception would be tantamount to > provoking a code fork. For a fork to happen, you need two parties. I haven't heard of anyone outside AdaCore actively working on fixing bugs and implementing new features in GNAT in a systematic manner (at least its compiler part). Backporting and forward-porting changes is a laudable activity, and I admire those who spend their spare time on it. But actually improving the compiler in a systematic way requires a new level of development activity. And you also have to keep in mind that AdaCore will happily take all the code you write and sell it to their customers, without compensating you. Not exactly motivating.