From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,24c70f80132ea540 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news2.google.com!news4.google.com!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!213.200.89.82.MISMATCH!tiscali!newsfeed1.ip.tiscali.net!news.tiscali.de!news.belwue.de!LF.net!news.enyo.de!not-for-mail From: Florian Weimer Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: No networking in Florist? Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 07:17:59 +0200 Message-ID: <87sl492e7s.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> References: <1192474217.628674.65600@v29g2000prd.googlegroups.com> <1192564043.758890.163550@e34g2000pro.googlegroups.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: idssi.enyo.de 1192684679 7208 212.9.189.177 (18 Oct 2007 05:17:59 GMT) X-Complaints-To: Cancel-Lock: sha1:onLXldg9B6ebscU3fq9WM93vjOY= Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:2475 Date: 2007-10-18T07:17:59+02:00 List-Id: * Manuel Gomez: > I wonder why. May be sockets support is buggy with current compiler? IIRC, the socket extensions in POSIX.5c never made it into the official standard. Since the standard is non-free, not widely available, and mostly irrelevant anyway (it doesn't deal with IPv6, for instance), it's a bit difficult to check.