From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Paul Rubin Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Why are Ada compilers difficult to write ? Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2018 20:31:54 -0700 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Message-ID: <87sh5f8pjp.fsf@nightsong.com> References: <584564c2-9f64-4965-b045-535cdaf899c0@googlegroups.com> <7cb22c58-3009-47f0-8fe7-62f3cd61785d@googlegroups.com> <52b14af1-ee0a-40af-871a-beeced6bce1c@googlegroups.com> <87wour97a8.fsf@nightsong.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="5cdfc4d7b006e347c3ce5bfea5e2b831"; logging-data="19052"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19H4Oo3glXn7aG4mMzkQV0q" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.3 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:oDRpapdNKVaBYGa6QJe6wUA2xrM= sha1:HTNtWraOtU3xojDjiOGyFrIU9EE= Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:53238 Date: 2018-06-21T20:31:54-07:00 List-Id: "Dan'l Miller" writes: > microcontrollers and DSPs and NPs are all severely > resource-constrained to the point of making any Ada or C++ or Java > support impractical therein. All of the above run fine on microcontrollers, though each has features that you'd want to avoid using under severe enough constraints. C itself is retro these days which is probably why there aren't "serious" new compilers for it being written. http://recc.robertelder.org/ is fairly recent but it's a hobby project and it's c89. But, I think lots of C users don't care much about C11. I haven't checked but it wouldn't surprise me if most or all of the commercial embedded compilers donn't support it.