From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,9d929352a358ccab X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!news3.google.com!news2.volia.net!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!news.belwue.de!LF.net!news.enyo.de!not-for-mail From: Florian Weimer Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Ada to C++ translator Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2006 19:45:56 +0100 Message-ID: <87r76uakuz.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> References: <1138132539.577082.206380@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> <87zmlkoz4k.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> <1320651.Sjn9jDnb0d@linux1.krischik.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: albireo.enyo.de 1138301156 9697 212.9.189.177 (26 Jan 2006 18:45:56 GMT) X-Complaints-To: Cancel-Lock: sha1:tuQaz4Q+D9ZrR8w38H1+8VOHbrs= Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:2659 Date: 2006-01-26T19:45:56+01:00 List-Id: * Martin Krischik: >> Implicit instantiation of templates, for example. Low-overhead >> destructors, parameterized exceptions and multiple inheritance come to >> my mind, too. And there is wild pointer arithmetic, of course. > > After 10 years of C++ I am unsure if those fine features really make > programming any easier. RAII (which really needs cheap destructors in some cases) does make programming easier. The rest, well -- it depends. Pointer arithmetic has no place except in allocators (or some high-performance numerical code), but parameterized exceptions are neat, and template metaprogramming can be quite helpful, too. Of course, C++ has also a fair number of truly obnoxious properties.