From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,4eb65fab6deaa097 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Florian Weimer Subject: Re: Lack of Mature Tools (was: Lockheed Martin, Green Hills, etc.) Date: 2000/05/05 Message-ID: <87pur1ti2x.fsf@deneb.cygnus.argh.org>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 619522520 References: <87aeidsgr8.fsf@think.mihalis.net> <8ep009$is3$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <8es4p0$423$1@nnrp1.deja.com> Mail-Copies-To: never Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Complaints-To: abuse@cygnus.argh.org X-Trace: deneb.cygnus.argh.org 957521975 14817 192.168.1.2 (5 May 2000 10:19:35 GMT) Organization: Penguin on board User-Agent: Gnus/5.0806 (Gnus v5.8.6) Emacs/20.6 Mime-Version: 1.0 Reply-To: Florian Weimer NNTP-Posting-Date: 5 May 2000 10:19:35 GMT Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 2000-05-05T10:19:35+00:00 List-Id: Robert Dewar writes: > We definitely cannot make any guarantee if you have a source > and a binary of GNAT that they match in the above sense. Indeed > we have OFTEN seen people distributing GNAT in a manner that is > inconsistent with the GPL, in that they do not bother about > their obligation to either distribute the source, or tell people > where to get it. In the past, you had to be inconsistent with the GPL if you wanted to redistribute the Windows version of GNAT in the form provided by Ada Core Technologies because you couldn't provide the sources of the installation program. ;) (Don't know if this has changed recently.)