From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
X-Google-Thread: 103376,ac193220dd94f402
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-01-09 12:08:08 PST
Path: 
 supernews.google.com!sn-xit-02!supernews.com!newsfeed.mesh.ad.jp!news.tele.dk!151.189.0.75!newsfeed.germany.net!uni-erlangen.de!news-nue1.dfn.de!news-han1.dfn.de!news.fh-hannover.de!news.cid.net!news.enyo.de!news1.enyo.de!not-for-mail
From: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Ada and Database
Date: 09 Jan 2001 21:15:32 +0100
Organization: Enyo's not your organization
Message-ID: <87puhwmqhn.fsf@deneb.enyo.de>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10101091042100.27577-100000@lexis.di.fct.unl.pt>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Xref: supernews.google.com comp.lang.ada:3830
Date: 2001-01-09T21:15:32+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Mario Amado Alves <maa@di.fct.unl.pt> writes:

> --You are probably right. What I meant is an _open_source_ license (e.g.
> Ad�lib's) slightly more restrictive than GPL may be compatible with GPL. 
> Thanks.

I think I have posted the link to the Debian Free Software Guidelines.
They are identical to the Open Source Definition, and the last time I
looked, your license was not compatible with these requirements...