From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,f44e8b91bd1d669d X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-05-16 12:56:33 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!colt.net!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!news.belwue.de!cert.uni-stuttgart.de!news.enyo.de!not-for-mail From: Florian Weimer Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Unusual syntax Date: Thu, 16 May 2002 21:56:31 +0200 Organization: Enyo -- not your organization Message-ID: <87ptzvc1e8.fsf@deneb.enyo.de> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: deneb.enyo.de Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: cygnus.enyo.de 1021578991 3257 212.9.189.171 (16 May 2002 19:56:31 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@enyo.de NNTP-Posting-Date: 16 May 2002 19:56:31 GMT Cancel-Lock: sha1:mV7zx6RbDGE4clOWAX1sw4cpIgE= Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:24229 Date: 2002-05-16T19:56:31+00:00 List-Id: "Steve Caddy" writes: > I was even more amazed when the first version compiled and functioned in > the same way as the second version. > > Has anyone come across this before? It's documented in Annex J. There are ASCII variants without the characters {|}[\]~@ (a widely deployed system is videotex with national code pages).