From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,ff7d8060c8210f40 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news2.google.com!news1.google.com!news.germany.com!news.belwue.de!LF.net!news.enyo.de!not-for-mail From: Florian Weimer Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: real_time.clock is not monotonic Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 09:50:29 +0100 Message-ID: <87ps7xnvze.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> References: <1172074608.834181.198540@j27g2000cwj.googlegroups.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: idssi.enyo.de 1172479866 1515 212.9.189.177 (26 Feb 2007 08:51:06 GMT) X-Complaints-To: Cancel-Lock: sha1:6NLU/JwUDHZ36BxKXXL10iVXbxA= Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:9543 Date: 2007-02-26T09:50:29+01:00 List-Id: * Simon Wright: > ("rdtsc" & ASCII.LF & ASCII.HT & This is not monotonic, either, because on some (most?) architectures, the cycle counters of the different CPUs are not synchronized.