From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,d3287d5ba796ff88
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!news.glorb.com!news.germany.com!news.belwue.de!LF.net!news.enyo.de!not-for-mail
From: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: GNAT documentation in Debian
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 16:40:25 +0200
Message-ID: <87ps6ce1ie.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de>
References: <ev5sbg$26k$1@online.de> <xzlkh5xluv.fsf@hod.lan.m-e-leypold.de>
	<871wivf1l8.fsf@ludovic-brenta.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: idssi.enyo.de 1176216025 15232 212.9.189.177 (10 Apr 2007 14:40:25
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: 
Cancel-Lock: sha1:YYJU0teyrNUcpJmXATpYJwEMMsM=
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:14862
Date: 2007-04-10T16:40:25+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

* Ludovic Brenta:

> None of the GCC maintainers (including myself) having sufficient time,
> energy or interest to produce the non-free doc packages, Nikita
> V. Youshchenko took it upon himself.  Unfortunately, he lacked the
> time, energy or interest to include the Ada docs.  You are welcome to
> file a wishlist bug against the source package `gcc-4.1-doc-non-dfsg',
> or contribute the necessary patches yourself.

Aren't the GNAT manuals suitable for main?  The boilerplate reads:

@copying
Copyright @copyright{} 1995-2005, Free Software Foundation

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document
under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2
or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation;
with the Invariant Sections being ``GNU Free Documentation License'', with the
Front-Cover Texts being
``@value{EDITION} User's Guide'',
and with no Back-Cover Texts.
A copy of the license is included in the section entitled
``GNU Free Documentation License''.
@end copying

I can ask upstream to remove the GFDL from the Invariant Sections
list.  Technically, this is a no-op anyway.